Think about how this challenge (Resource Conflicts and Multitasking) may have affected you while serving as a project member or part of a team.   Define the concept you selected in your own words Describe your experience as it relates to the concept. Share what you learned from this comparison of your experience as it relates to project management.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 21P
icon
Related questions
Question
Think about how this challenge (Resource Conflicts and Multitasking) may have affected you while serving as a project member or part of a team.   Define the concept you selected in your own words Describe your experience as it relates to the concept. Share what you learned from this comparison of your experience as it relates to project management.
✓
Problem 3: Resource Conflicts and Multitasking
Most projects operate in a multiproject environment. This environment creates the problems of project interdependency and the need to
share resources. For example, what would be the impact on the labor resource pool of a construction company if it should win a contract
it would like to bid on? Will existing labor be adequate to deal with the new project-given the completion date? Will current projects be
delayed? Will subcontracting help? Which projects will have priority? Competition among project managers can be contentious. All
project managers seek to have the best people for their projects. The problems of sharing resources and scheduling resources across
projects grow exponentially as the number of projects rises. In multiproject environments the stakes are higher and the benefits or
penalties for good or bad resource scheduling become even more significant than in most single projects (Mortensen & Gardner, 2017).
Resource sharing also leads to multitasking. Multitasking involves starting and stopping work on one task to go and work on another
project, then returning to the work on the original task. People working on several tasks concurrently are far less efficient, especially where
conceptual or physical shutdown and start-up are significant. Multitasking adds to delays and costs. Changing priorities exacerbate the
multitasking problems even more. Likewise, multitasking is more evident in organizations that have too many projects for the resources
they command.
The number of small and large projects in a portfolio almost always exceeds the available resources. This capacity overload inevitably leads
to confusion and inefficient use of scarce organizational resources. The presence of an implementation gap, of power politics, and of
multitasking adds the problem of which projects are allocated resources first. Employee morale and confidence suffer because it is
difficult to make sense of an ambiguous system. A multiproject organizational environment faces major problems without a priority system
that is clearly linked to the strategic plan. See Exhibit 2.2, which lists a few key benefits of Project Portfolio Management: the list could
Aa
Transcribed Image Text:✓ Problem 3: Resource Conflicts and Multitasking Most projects operate in a multiproject environment. This environment creates the problems of project interdependency and the need to share resources. For example, what would be the impact on the labor resource pool of a construction company if it should win a contract it would like to bid on? Will existing labor be adequate to deal with the new project-given the completion date? Will current projects be delayed? Will subcontracting help? Which projects will have priority? Competition among project managers can be contentious. All project managers seek to have the best people for their projects. The problems of sharing resources and scheduling resources across projects grow exponentially as the number of projects rises. In multiproject environments the stakes are higher and the benefits or penalties for good or bad resource scheduling become even more significant than in most single projects (Mortensen & Gardner, 2017). Resource sharing also leads to multitasking. Multitasking involves starting and stopping work on one task to go and work on another project, then returning to the work on the original task. People working on several tasks concurrently are far less efficient, especially where conceptual or physical shutdown and start-up are significant. Multitasking adds to delays and costs. Changing priorities exacerbate the multitasking problems even more. Likewise, multitasking is more evident in organizations that have too many projects for the resources they command. The number of small and large projects in a portfolio almost always exceeds the available resources. This capacity overload inevitably leads to confusion and inefficient use of scarce organizational resources. The presence of an implementation gap, of power politics, and of multitasking adds the problem of which projects are allocated resources first. Employee morale and confidence suffer because it is difficult to make sense of an ambiguous system. A multiproject organizational environment faces major problems without a priority system that is clearly linked to the strategic plan. See Exhibit 2.2, which lists a few key benefits of Project Portfolio Management: the list could Aa
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,