Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 9Q
Summary Introduction
Case summary:
Person S is a representative of person T agrees to purchase stainless steel from person R. Person R later revealed to person S and person T that he is acting as an agent for person U.
To discuss: The rights of each party on the occasion of a contract breach.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Facts: On February 1, 2004, Buyer entered into a contract to buy Seller’s house in Las Vegas for $532,500 with a March closing date. On February 3, 2004 Seller notified Buyer that he was terminating the contract (without any legal basis for taking such action). The Seller then told Buyer that he would sell him the house for a higher price. On February 3, 2004, Buyer and Seller entered into a new contract for a price of $578,000. On February 16, 2004, the Seller refused to perform under the contract. The Buyer sued seeking to enforce the contract.
Question: Under the common law of contracts, is the modification to the original contract enforceable?
Deliverable: Write a clear, grammatically correct answer being sure to address the following points in your answer:
Provide a clear statement of the governing legal principle (also called a ‘black letter law’). The ‘governing legal principle’ in any case is the legal principle that is the key to completing the legal analysis of the problem…
Norma English made an offer to purchase a house owned by Michael and Laurie Montgomery (Montgomery) for $272,000. In her offer, English also proposed to purchase certain personal property—paving stones and a fireplace screen worth a total of $100—from Montgomery. When Montgomery received English’s offer, Montgomery made many changes to English’s offer, including deleting the paving stones and fireplace screen from the personal property that English wanted. When English received the Montgomery counteroffer, English accepted and initialed all of Montgomery’s changes except that English did not initial the change that deleted the paving stones and fireplace screen from the deal.Subsequently, Montgomery notified English that because English had not completely accepted the terms of Montgomery’s counteroffer, Montgomery was therefore withdrawing from the deal. That same day, Montgomery signed a contract to sell the house to another buyer for $285,000. English sued Montgomery for specific…
Palmer made a valid contract with Ames under which Ames was to sell Palmer’s goods on commission from January 1 to June 30. Ames made satisfactory sales up to May 15 and was then about to close an unusually large order when Palmer suddenly and without notice revoked Ames’s authority to sell. Can Ames continue to sell Palmer’s goods during the unexpired term of her contract?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Smith, having contracted to sell to Beyer thirty tons of described fertilizer, shipped to Beyer by carrier thirty tons of fertilizer, which he stated conformed to the contract. Nothing was stated in the contract as to time of payment, but Smith demanded payment as a condition of handing over the fertilizer to Beyer. Beyer refused to pay unless he was given the opportunity to inspect the fertilizer. Who is correct? Explain.arrow_forwardEd win sells a sofa to Jack for $800. Edwin and Jack both know that the sofa is in Edwin’s warehouse, located approximately ten miles from Jack’s home. The contract does not specify the place of delivery, and Jack insists that the place of delivery is either his house or Edwin’s store. Is Jack correct? Why or why not?arrow_forwardAnderson, a farmer, orally agreed to buy a used tractor from the Copeland Equipment Company for $475. Copeland delivered the tractor to Anderson, who used it for 11 days. During this period, Anderson could not borrow enough funds to cover the purchase price. Anderson therefore returned the tractor to Copeland. Both parties agreed that their sales contract was canceled when the tractor was returned. However, Copeland later claimed that under the doctrine of quasi- contract, Anderson was required to pay for the 11-day use of the tractor. Do you agree with Copeland? Explain your answer. [See Anderson v. Copeland, 378 P.2d 1006 (OK).]arrow_forward
- Ming entered into a contract with Lee to supply Lee with smuggled cigarettes. Lee received the smuggled cigarettes and tried to sell them off at a profit. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Lee could not find any buyer for the smuggled cigarettes. Without any profit, Lee was unable to pay Ming the outstanding sum under their contract. Required: Analyse whether Ming is entitled to seek assistance from the court to claim back the outstanding sum under the contract from Lee. Support your discussion with relevant legal principles and cases, if any.arrow_forward2. Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale of 100 acres of land. They orally agree on a price of $100,000, with payment to be made within 10 days and the deed delivered within another 30 days. Buyer sends Seller a letter in which all these terms are included, along with a check for $100,000 that Seller deposits. Seller fails to deliver a deed, and Buyer seeks to enforce the contract. Is the contract enforceable?arrow_forwardScott, manufacturer of a carbonated beverage, entered into a contract with Otis, owner of a baseball park, whereby Otis rented to Scott a large signboard on top of the center field wall. The contract provided that Otis should letter the sign as Scott desired and would change the lettering from time to time within forty-eight hours after receipt of written request from Scott. As directed by Scott, the signboard originally stated in large letters that Scott would pay $1,000 to any ballplayer hitting a home run over the sign. In the first game of the season, Hume, the best hitter in the league, hit one home run over the sign. Scott immediately served written notice on Otis instructing Otis to replace the offer on the signboard with an offer to pay $500 to every pitcher who pitched a no-hit game in the park. A week after receipt of Scott’s letter, Otis had not changed the wording on the sign. On that day, Perry, a pitcher for a scheduled game, pitched a no-hit game while Todd, one of his…arrow_forward
- On November 19, Hoover Motor Express Company sent to Clements Paper Company a written offer to purchase certain real estate. Sometime in December, Clements authorized Williams to accept. Williams, however, attempted to bargain with Hoover to obtain a better deal, specifically that Clements would retain easements on the property. In a telephone conversation on January 13 of the following year, Williams first told Hoover of his plan to obtain the easements. Hoover replied, “Well, I don’t know if we are ready. We have not decided; we might not want to go through with it.” On January 20, Clements sent a written acceptance of Hoover’s offer. Hoover refused to buy, claiming it had revoked its offer through the January 13 phone conversation. Clements then brought suit to compel the sale or obtain damages. Did Hoover successfully revoke its offer? Explain.arrow_forwardA offered to sell his automobile to B for P50,000. After inspecting the automobile, B offered to buy it for P50,000. This offer was accepted by A. The next day, A offered to deliver the automobile, but B, being short of funds, secured a postponement of the delivery, promising to pay A the price “upon arrival in this port of the steamer Helena.” The steamer, however, never arrived because it was wrecked somewhere off the coast of Samar. (a) Is there a perfected contract in this case? Why? (b) Is the promise to pay made by B conditional or with a term? Why? (c) Can A compel B to pay the purchase price and to accept the automobile? Why?arrow_forwardGerry a plumber is hired under a written contract to refurbish Bryan's master bathroom and Bryan's first floor half bath for $45,000. Bryan gave Gerry a $5,000 check to start. Upon completion of the project Gerry gave Bryan his final invoice. Bryan refused to pay. What can Gerry do to protect his interest and receive his pay? Would your answer change if the contract was to refurbish all the bathrooms at Bryan's grocery store? If yes what changes would you make?arrow_forward
- Mr. Oliver entered into contract with his friend Mr. Green to transport some material in two weeks’ time. About a month before the delivery was to be made, the material was banned by the legislature, and so delivery was not possible. Mr. Green could have been arrested by the police if he was caught delivering the goods, but he delivered it anyway. Mr. Oliver refuses to pay. i. What can you say about the contract Mr. Oliver and Mr. Green entered into? ii. Should Mr. Green have made the delivery? why or why not? iii. Can Mr. Green enforce payment? why or why not. iv. What was the impact of the legislative action on the contract?arrow_forwardOn 20th May, 2021, Mr. Qais offered to sell a camel for OMR 25,000 to Mr. Khalid through phone, for which Khalid agreed. On 23rd May, Khalid received the written and signed contract from Qais. Khalid signed it on 26th May, and then returned it to Qais on 27th May. When did a legally binding contract come into effect? O a. 20th May O b. 26th May O c 23rd May O d. 27th Mayarrow_forwardJim offered to buy James’s Porsche motor vehicle. Jim gave James 2 weeks for an answer. Two days after, Jane offered to sell her Porsche motor vehicle to Jim for which he was very excited to purchase because she had the latest model. Jim called James and told him personally that he is no longer interested in purchasing his Porsche. James is very upset, because he was keen to sell. He is of the view that Jim cannot withdraw his offer because the two weeks has not elapsed. He knows that you are a business law student at Open Campus and sought your advice on the matter. Advise James. Will your answer be the same, if Jim failed to communicate to James within the two weeks that he no longer is interested in purchasing James’s Porsche motor vehicle and James accepted on the last day of the end of the two weeks? Required to use the IRAC* method to answerarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON