Samsung Expensive Cheap Apple Expensive Cheap 4,4 6,2 2,6 3,3 Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone, while Apple offers only an expensive phone, Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn $3 billion. What are the profits in the Nash Equilibrium? Both firms earn $4 billion. Samsung earns $2 billion and Apple earns $6 billion. Samsung earns $6 billion and Apple earns $2 billion. Both firms earn $3 billion. оооо

Samsung Expensive Cheap Apple Expensive Cheap 4,4 6,2 2,6 3,3 Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone, while Apple offers only an expensive phone, Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn $3 billion. What are the profits in the Nash Equilibrium? Both firms earn $4 billion. Samsung earns $2 billion and Apple earns $6 billion. Samsung earns $6 billion and Apple earns $2 billion. Both firms earn $3 billion. оооо

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4. Suppose in 1977 Honda and Toyota each have to decide whether to build an automobile plant in the North American market. The payoff matrix below shows Honda's payoff on the left, and Toyota's on the right. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, where, and how do you know? Тoyota Build small Don't build anything plant Build small 16, 16 20, 15 Honda plant Don't build anything 15, 20 18, 18
3. Suppose there are two movie rental stores in town: Captain Video and Movie Mania. These movie rental firms face a choice between two advertising strategies: television (T) and radio (R). Captain Video will be the first firm to make a decision, and their decision will be based on the anticipated action of Movie Mania. A game tree is provided below: Captain Video T R Movie Mania Movie Mania RT T R $800, $600 $600, $750 $400, $400 $250, $450 Find the Nash equilibrium using the backward induction method. Please explain the decision making process of each firm. (3 pts)
15. Consider two competing firms, JR and OG. Suppose OG produces an estab- lished product and JR can either produce a clone or a differentiated product. If JR produces a clone, OG can either sue JR or not sue it. If JR produces a differentiated product rather than a clone, OG can either buy JR or not buy it. The two firms are in a non-cooperative game whose extensive form is rep- resented in the tree diagram below, where the payoffs on the right represent profits. -1 for OG 1 for JR sue OG don't -2 for OG clone sue 1 for JR JR don't clone 1 for OG -1 for JR buy OG don't buy 2 for OG 0 for JR If the two firms' managers are rational and recognize each other as rational, then (a) JR clones and OG sues (b) JR does not clone and OG buys (c) JR does not clone and OG does not buy (d) JR clones and OG does not sue (e) JR clones and OG sues with probability .5
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Expresso and Beantown are the only two firms that sell coffee. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Beantown Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 9, 9 15, 3 Expresso Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Expresso advertises and Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso will make a profit of $15 million, and Beantown will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Expresso and Beantown are both profit-maximizing firms. If Expresso decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Expresso decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Beantown advertises, Expresso makes a higher profit if…
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Lucky Bird and Full Coop, are the only sellers of seitan buffalo wings in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Lucky Bird Full Coop Advertise Advertise 9,9 Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 Doesn't Advertise 15,3 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Full Coop advertises and Lucky Bird does not advertise, Full Coop will make a profit of $15 million, and Lucky Bird will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Lucky Bird and Full Coop are both profit- maximizing firms. If Lucky Bird chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of S advertise. If Lucky Bird chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of s not advertise. million if Full Coop advertises and a profit of If Full Coop advertises, Lucky Bird makes a higher profit if it chooses…
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Expresso and Beantown are the only two firms that sell coffee. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Expresso Advertise Doesn't Advertise Beantown Advertise 10, 10 2, 18 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Expresso advertises and Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso will make a profit of $18 million, and Beantown will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Expresso and Beantown are both profit-maximizing firms. Doesn't Advertise 18, 2 11, 11 If Expresso decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of S advertise. If Expresso decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of S not advertise. O O million if Beantown advertises and a profit of s If Beantown advertises, Expresso makes a higher profit if it chooses If Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso makes a higher profit if it cnot to advertise…
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…
P&G 1.10 1.20 1.10 - 226 - 215 1.20 - 106 - 89 1.30 - 56 - 37 1.40 - 44 - 25 1.50 - 52 -32 1.60 - 70 -51 - 93 -76 1.70 1,80 - 118 - 102 Why is this situation an example of the prisoners' dilemma game? This game is a type of prisoners' dilemma because O A. the firms are rivals. OB. competing maximizes joint firm profits. O C. the game results in cooperation. Click to select your answer. 1.30 - 204 -73 - 19 -6 - 15 - 34 - 59 -87 1.40 -194 - 58 2 S 12 5 3 - 18 -44 -72 1.50 - 183 - 43 15 29 20 -1 - 28 -57 1.60 - 174 - 28 31 46 36 14 -13 -44 1.70 - 165 - 15 47 62 52 30 1 -30 130 15228841517 1.80 - -2 62 68 44
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises,…
10:04 PM cb = Chegg Economics Vo LTE expert.chegg.com/expertqna Time remaining: 00:09:49 Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k. O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k. Answer Skip 4G Exit 2 ¹20%
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
Refer to the table below to answer the following questions. Table 14.2.10 Fim A Comply A: Sim Cheat A $1 Sm Comply B Sim B-S05m Firm B A:-50.5m A0 Cheat B $15m B:0 Refer to Table 14.2.10. Firm A and Firm B are the only producers of soap powder. They collude and agree to share the market equally. The equilibrium a dominant strategy equilibrium because the strategy in this game is for a firm Select one O A is to comply regardless of the other firm's choice O B.is to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies O Cis not to comply when the other firm complies and to cheat when the other firm cheats OD. is to cheat regardless of the other firm's choice OEis not to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies 219 PM