Apple Expensive Cheap 2,6 3,3 Samsung Expensive 4,4 Cheap 6.2 Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone. while Apple offers only an expensive phone. Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn S3 billion. What is each firm's dominant strategy? o The dominant strategy for both firms is to offer a cheap phone. The dominant strategy for both firms is to offer an expensive phone. The dominant strategy for Apple is to offer a cheap phone, but Samsung does not have a dominant strategy. The dominant seracegy for Apple is to offer an expensive phone, but Samsung does not have a dominant strategy.

Apple Expensive Cheap 2,6 3,3 Samsung Expensive 4,4 Cheap 6.2 Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone. while Apple offers only an expensive phone. Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn S3 billion. What is each firm's dominant strategy? o The dominant strategy for both firms is to offer a cheap phone. The dominant strategy for both firms is to offer an expensive phone. The dominant strategy for Apple is to offer a cheap phone, but Samsung does not have a dominant strategy. The dominant seracegy for Apple is to offer an expensive phone, but Samsung does not have a dominant strategy.

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Samsung Expensive Cheap Apple Expensive Cheap 2,6 3,3 4,4 6,2 Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone, while Apple offers only an expensive phone, Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn $3 billion. What are the profits in the Nash Equilibrium? Both firms earn $4 billion. Samsung earns $2 billion and Apple earns $6 billion. Samsung earns $6 billion and Apple earns $2 billion. Both firms earn $3 billion.
II.2 Companies A and B can compete on advertising or R&D. The profits (in millions of $ million) of the two firms are given in the table below assumig that they play a one-shot simultancous mov game (the profit or firm A is listed first in every cell of the matrix, followed by the profit of firm B): Advertising R&D 50, 25 10, 70 20, 40 60, 35 1. Find the mixed strategy equilibrium. A\B Advertising R&D 2. What are the expected profits for both firms in this equilibrium?
3. Suppose there are two movie rental stores in town: Captain Video and Movie Mania. These movie rental firms face a choice between two advertising strategies: television (T) and radio (R). Captain Video will be the first firm to make a decision, and their decision will be based on the anticipated action of Movie Mania. A game tree is provided below: Captain Video T R Movie Mania Movie Mania RT T R $800, $600 $600, $750 $400, $400 $250, $450 Find the Nash equilibrium using the backward induction method. Please explain the decision making process of each firm. (3 pts)
10:04 PM cb = Chegg Economics Vo LTE expert.chegg.com/expertqna Time remaining: 00:09:49 Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k. O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k. Answer Skip 4G Exit 2 ¹20%
4. Suppose in 1977 Honda and Toyota each have to decide whether to build an automobile plant in the North American market. The payoff matrix below shows Honda's payoff on the left, and Toyota's on the right. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, where, and how do you know? Тoyota Build small Don't build anything plant Build small 16, 16 20, 15 Honda plant Don't build anything 15, 20 18, 18
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…
Apple and Samsung control the majority of the Smart Phones. Suppose the diagram above represents their strategic options, either to offer an expensive or a cheap phone in the market. If both firms offer an expensive phone, they will each earn 4 billion dollars. If Samsung offers a cheap phone, while Apple offers only an expensive phone, Samsung will earn $6 billion and Apple will earn $2 billion, and vice versa. If they both offer a cheap phone, they will each earn $3 billion. What are the profits in the Nash Equilibrium? a. Samsung earns $2 billion and Apple earns $6 billion. b. Both firms earn $3 billion. c. Both firms earn $4 billion. d. Samsung earns $6 billion and Apple earns $2 billion.
Discuss what can be the expected resultof the firms in the oligopoly, that is, that can be the expected Nash Equilibrium solution fora household cleaning appliance.
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Expresso and Beantown are the only two firms that sell coffee. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Beantown Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 9, 9 15, 3 Expresso Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Expresso advertises and Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso will make a profit of $15 million, and Beantown will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Expresso and Beantown are both profit-maximizing firms. If Expresso decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Expresso decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Beantown advertises, Expresso makes a higher profit if…
Refer to the table below to answer the following questions. Table 14.2.10 Fim A Comply A: Sim Cheat A $1 Sm Comply B Sim B-S05m Firm B A:-50.5m A0 Cheat B $15m B:0 Refer to Table 14.2.10. Firm A and Firm B are the only producers of soap powder. They collude and agree to share the market equally. The equilibrium a dominant strategy equilibrium because the strategy in this game is for a firm Select one O A is to comply regardless of the other firm's choice O B.is to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies O Cis not to comply when the other firm complies and to cheat when the other firm cheats OD. is to cheat regardless of the other firm's choice OEis not to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies 219 PM
Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise DoesntAdvertise Advertise 10, 10 18, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 18 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $18 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it…
Smith Cable, Inc. and Jones Glass Fibre Works are the two largest suppliers of a specialty fiber-optic cable used by NASA and military defense contractors. On the first day of every month, both companies post on the Internet a list of prices for their various fiber-optic cable products-either high prices or low prices. The following payoff table provides the monthly profits for Smith and Jones: Jones Glass Fibre Works High prices Low prices A C Smith Cable, Inc. High prices $7, S4 B D Low prices $2, $5.5 $8, S1 $4, $2 Payoffs in dollars of monthly profit (a) Suppose the pricing decision is made sequentially. Using the payoff table, complete the two sequential game trees. In the first game tree, let Smith Cable, Inc. make the first pricing decision. In the second game tree, let Jones Glass Fibre Works go first. After you complete the two game trees, solve both sequential decision games using the roll-back method. Circle the solution path on each game tree. (b) Do Smith Cable, Inc. and…