The authors of a paper compared two different methods for measuring body fat percentage. One method uses ultrasound, and the other method uses X-ray technology. The table gives body fat percentages for 16 athletes using each of these methods (a subset of the data given in a graph that appeared in the paper). For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the 16 athletes who participated in this study are representative of the population of athletes. Athlete X-ray 1 4.75 2 7.00 3 9.25 4 12.00 5 17.25 6 29.50 7 5.50 8 6.00 9 8.00 8.50 9.25 11.00 12.00 LUSE SALT Hoi Ha=0 H₂: Hg 0 10 Ho! HO H₂Hg <0 Hoi Ha =0 H₂H0 Hoi Ha0 11 12 13 14 14.00 15 17.00 16 18.00 Ho: H0 H₂i Hg=0 Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean body fat percentage measurement differs for the two methods? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a = 0.05. (Use Hd x-ray-Hultrasound) State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Ultrasound 4.75 4.00 9.00 11.75 17.00 27.75 6.50 6.75 8.75 9.75 9.50 12.00 12.25 15.75 18.00 18.50 Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use a table or SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) t 0.534 x P-value 0.000 X State the conclusion in the problem context.

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter1: Functions
Section1.2: The Least Square Line
Problem 8E
icon
Related questions
Question
The authors of a paper compared two different methods for measuring body fat percentage. One method uses ultrasound, and the other method uses X-ray technology. The table gives body fat percentages for 16 athletes using each of these methods (a subset of the data given in a graph that appeared in the paper). For
purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the 16 athletes who participated in this study are representative of the population of athletes.
Athlete
Ho: Md = 0
Ha: Ha< 0
Ho: M₁ = 0
Ha: Md 0
Ho: Md 0
Ha: Md
Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean body fat percentage measurement differs for the two methods? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a =
State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.
Ho: Md = 0
Ha: Md > 0
= 0
Ho: Md < 0
Ha: Md
P-value =
X-ray
4.75
7.00
9.25
12.00
5
17.25
6
29.50
7
5.50
8
6.00
9
8.00
10
8.50
11
9.25
12
11.00
13 12.00
14
14.00
15
17.00
16 18.00
= 0
1
2
3
4
USE SALT
Ultrasound
4.75
4.00
9.00
11.75
17.00
27.75
6.50
6.75
8.75
9.75
9.50
12.00
12.25
15.75
18.00
18.50
Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use a table or SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.)
t = 0.534
0.000
X
X
State the conclusion in the problem context.
We fail to reiect H. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean body fat percentage measurement differs for the two methods
0.05. (Use μ = Mx-ray - Multrasound)
Transcribed Image Text:The authors of a paper compared two different methods for measuring body fat percentage. One method uses ultrasound, and the other method uses X-ray technology. The table gives body fat percentages for 16 athletes using each of these methods (a subset of the data given in a graph that appeared in the paper). For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the 16 athletes who participated in this study are representative of the population of athletes. Athlete Ho: Md = 0 Ha: Ha< 0 Ho: M₁ = 0 Ha: Md 0 Ho: Md 0 Ha: Md Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean body fat percentage measurement differs for the two methods? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a = State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: Md = 0 Ha: Md > 0 = 0 Ho: Md < 0 Ha: Md P-value = X-ray 4.75 7.00 9.25 12.00 5 17.25 6 29.50 7 5.50 8 6.00 9 8.00 10 8.50 11 9.25 12 11.00 13 12.00 14 14.00 15 17.00 16 18.00 = 0 1 2 3 4 USE SALT Ultrasound 4.75 4.00 9.00 11.75 17.00 27.75 6.50 6.75 8.75 9.75 9.50 12.00 12.25 15.75 18.00 18.50 Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use a table or SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) t = 0.534 0.000 X X State the conclusion in the problem context. We fail to reiect H. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean body fat percentage measurement differs for the two methods 0.05. (Use μ = Mx-ray - Multrasound)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 8 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL