Starbucks and Krispy Kreme are trying todecide whether or not to open a shop inthe new Mall of Africa. They both prefer ifthe other firm opens a shop because theycan draw bigger crowds but neither wantsto be the only American-branded coffeeshop in the Mall. The payoff matrix for thisdilemma is below.Krispy KremeOpen Don't OpenStarbucksOpen (i)(ii)5.52,6Don't open(iii)(iii)6,23.3MCQ question 4Find the Nash Equilibrium (Starbucks,Krispy Kreme) for the payoff matrix whenthe game is played simultaneously.A. (5;5) only.OB. (6,2) only.OC. (2,6) onlyOD. (3,3) onlyO E. There is no stable Nash Equilibrium.

Detailed Explanation: The Nash equilibrium in the payoff matrix for this game can be found by…

Answered: Starbucks and Krispy Kreme are trying…

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

. When Chinese automakers began exporting cars, rather thanfocusing on developed nations in the West, they shippedautos to emerging markets in countries such as Algeria, Russia,Chile, and South Africa. In these markets, even used vehiclesfrom multinational manufacturers are relatively scarce—andrelatively expensive. The Chinese automakers, who prioritizelow cost rather than design or even safety, applied a penetration-pricing strategy. A woman in Santiago, Chile, who boughta new Chery S21 explained, “The price factor is fairly decisive.I paid $5,500 new and full. Toyota with similar features costsaround $12,000.” Why do you think Chinese automakerschose that pricing strategy? Do you think it was successful?As Chinese regulators pressure these manufacturers to maketheir cars safer, do you think they will be able to keep theirprices low compared with those of the international automakers? Why or why not?26
fnan421 WWord Gozden Geç r Gorunum Varc m Ne yaomak steci gnz soy evn 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) If both firms make their decisions at the same time and follow maximin (low-risk) strategies, what will the outcome be? B) Suppose both firms try to maximize profits, but Firm X has a head start in planning, and can commit first. Now what will the outcome be? What will the outcome be if Firm Y has a head start in planning and can commit first? I
Would it be wise for a brick-and-mortar retailer thatwants to stop showrooming to use wireless-jammingtechnologies to prevent people from using smartphonesinside its stores? Why or why not?
4. Suppose in 1977 Honda and Toyota each have to decide whether to build an automobile plant in the North American market. The payoff matrix below shows Honda's payoff on the left, and Toyota's on the right. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, where, and how do you know? Тoyota Build small Don't build anything plant Build small 16, 16 20, 15 Honda plant Don't build anything 15, 20 18, 18
fnan421 Word Gozden Geçir Górunum Vard m e vaomak sted nz sOv eyin 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 20, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) What is the cooperative outcome? B) Which firm benefits most from the cooperative outcome? How much would that firm need to offer the other?
mall Dynaco Jains Pynaco gains 4. Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high - tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they determine the size of their research budget: Synergy's Deeision Small Bodget Lange Budget Synergy gain $420M Symedgy Dynaco ins Large budget Dynaro gains $30M Synergy Small Dynaco Jains Budget Jains zero Dynae's 2ero gains $70m Synergy Pynaco gains gains #50M Decision a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain. b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain. c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
Kate and Alice are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolints. The market demand tunction is o- 20,000 - 200Pwhere Pis the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Ois the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is sa0 per cubic yard. Suppose Kate onters the market first and chooses her output belore Alice. What is the difference in Alice's profit when Kata enters the market tirst, compared to when they simultanecusly select ther outputa? When Kate entors the markat first, Alice's profit is $3,888.a0 lower. O When Kate enters the market fest, Alice's profit is 513,333.33 lower. O When Kate enters the market first, Alice's profit is $5,000 lower. O When Kate onters the market first, Alice's proft is $1.111.11 higher,
You are playing a game with a friend. It’s yourmove but you don’t have a dominant strategy.Your payoff depends on what your friend doesafter your move. You consider flipping a coin todecide what to do. You are about to reach for acoin, but then you realize that your friend has adominant strategy. Explain how using backwardinduction (rather than a coin toss) will now determine your next move
fnan421 Word Gözden Geçir Görünüm Varam V Ne yapmak isted ginzi soyieyin 2) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop TV, Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP PHONE FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 20, 50 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 50,80 PHONE 50,20 80,50 10,10 A) Find the Nash equilibria for this game, assuming that both firms make their decisions at the same time. (explain the decision step by step)i B) If each firm is risk averse and uses a maximin strategy, what will be the resulting equilibrium? (explain the decision step by step);
Consider the payoff matrix of Hulu and Netflix. Why don't both firms just raise prices? NETFLIX HULU 15, 15 8, 20 20, 8 10, 10 O It is in each firm's profitable interest to lower prices, no matter what the other competitor does. O Raising prices is illegal in this case. O Firms are concerned about a third competitor entering at higher prices. O Higher prices will increase the number of customers beyond what the firms can handle.
OA OB OC Alpha's Price Policy OD. High Low A с Beta's Price Policy High Low $20 $30 $20 $10 B D $10 The diagram above shows potential outcomes for two oligopolistic competitors. Beta's profits are shown in the upper right corner of each box and Alpha's profits in the lower left corner. If Alpha and Beta engage in collusion (and do not cheat), where will they end up? $15 $30 $15
Think about firms such as the Coca Cola Company and PepsiCo who competeagainst each other in the monopolistically competitive market for soft drinks. Eachfirm produces a unique product, but each of these unique products is to some extenta substitute for the soft drinks produced by rival companies.Now imagine a situation where the firms within such a market are facing suchextreme competition that they are unable to make an operating profit. Characterisethis situation diagrammatically and explain what will happen to the market, payingparticular attention to the exit or entry of firms out of (or into) the market.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics 2e

Economics

ISBN:

9781947172364

Author:

Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:

OpenStax

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics 2e

Economics

ISBN:

9781947172364

Author:

Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:

OpenStax

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS