On December 15, 2003, Levi Strauss & Company announced it would close two last remaining apparel plants in the United States to finalize its transition from a clothing manufacturer to a marketing, sales, and design company. Beginning in 2004, all Levi's apparel was to be produced by contract manufacturers located in low-wage countries. As recently as 1990, Levi Strauss had produced 90 percent of its apparel in company-owned plants in the United States employing over 20, 000 production workers. With every plant closing, Levi Strauss and Company provide severance and job retaining packages to affected workers and cash payments to small communities where its plant were located. Still, these communities struggled to recover from the loss of jobs associated with Levi Strauss's closings' many of the former Levi Strauss employees who took new jobs found it difficult to match their previous levels of compensation and benefits. Questions: Does Levi Strauss's strategy to outsource its manufacturing pass the moral scrutiny test? Is it ethical for a company to close plants employing 20,000 workers and shift production to low-wage-paying contract manufacturers in foreign countries? Why or why not?

Principles Of Marketing
17th Edition
ISBN:9780134492513
Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1DQ
icon
Related questions
Question
Crafting and executing strategy are core management functions. Whether a company wins or
loses in the market place is directly attributable to the caliber of that company's strategy and the
proficiency with which the strategy is executed. Read this simple case and answer given
questions
On December 15, 2003, Levi Strauss & Company announced it would close two last
remaining apparel plants in the United States to finalize its transition from a clothing
manufacturer to a marketing, sales, and design company. Beginning in 2004, all Levi's
apparel was to be produced by contract manufacturers located in low-wage countries. As
recently as 1990, Levi Strauss had produced 90 percent of its apparel in company-owned
plants in the United States employing over 20, 000 production workers. With every plant
closing, Levi Strauss and Company provide severance and job retaining packages to
affected workers and cash payments to small communities where its plant were located.
Still, these communities struggled to recover from the loss of jobs associated with Levi
Strauss's closings' many of the former Levi Strauss employees who took new jobs found
it difficult to match their previous levels of compensation and benefits.
Questions:
Does Levi Strauss's strategy to outsource its manufacturing pass the moral scrutiny test?
Is it ethical for a company to close plants employing 20,000 workers and shift production
to low-wage-paying contract manufacturers in foreign countries? Why or why not?
Transcribed Image Text:Crafting and executing strategy are core management functions. Whether a company wins or loses in the market place is directly attributable to the caliber of that company's strategy and the proficiency with which the strategy is executed. Read this simple case and answer given questions On December 15, 2003, Levi Strauss & Company announced it would close two last remaining apparel plants in the United States to finalize its transition from a clothing manufacturer to a marketing, sales, and design company. Beginning in 2004, all Levi's apparel was to be produced by contract manufacturers located in low-wage countries. As recently as 1990, Levi Strauss had produced 90 percent of its apparel in company-owned plants in the United States employing over 20, 000 production workers. With every plant closing, Levi Strauss and Company provide severance and job retaining packages to affected workers and cash payments to small communities where its plant were located. Still, these communities struggled to recover from the loss of jobs associated with Levi Strauss's closings' many of the former Levi Strauss employees who took new jobs found it difficult to match their previous levels of compensation and benefits. Questions: Does Levi Strauss's strategy to outsource its manufacturing pass the moral scrutiny test? Is it ethical for a company to close plants employing 20,000 workers and shift production to low-wage-paying contract manufacturers in foreign countries? Why or why not?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles Of Marketing
Principles Of Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134492513
Author:
Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:
Pearson Higher Education,
Marketing
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9781259924040
Author:
Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337386920
Author:
William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134149530
Author:
Gary Armstrong, Philip Kotler
Publisher:
PEARSON
MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT
MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337407595
Author:
Lamb
Publisher:
Cengage
Contemporary Marketing
Contemporary Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780357033777
Author:
Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning