Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election. Political analysts wonder if turnout in rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 669 of 892 registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 414 out of 575 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. (a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural Minnesota were more likely than registered voters in urban Minnesota to vote in the 2016 presidential election. (Let P₁ = the population proportion of voters in rural Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election and p₂ = the population proportion of voters in urban Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election.) Ho: P₁ P₂ *0 H2: P1-р2-0 Ho: P₁ H: P₁ Ho: P₁ Ha P1 10. Ho: P₁ H: P₁ P₂=0 P₂ #0 P₂ 201 P₂ <0 P₂ <0 P₂ = 0 Ho: P1-P₂ ≤ 0 H₂P₁ P₂ > 0 (b) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in rural Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (c) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in urban Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (d) At a = 0.05, test the political analysts' hypothesis. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) ralue? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 13CYU
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
You may need to use the appropriate appendix table or technology to answer this question.
Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.t Political analysts wonder if turnout in rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that
669 of 892 registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 414 out of 575 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted.
(a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural Minnesota were more likely than registered voters in urban Minnesota to vote in the 2016 presidential election.
(Let P1
= the population proportion of voters in rural Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election and p₂ = the population proportion of voters in urban Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election.)
Ho: P₁ P₂ #0
Ha: P₁
P₂ = 0
esc
1
Ho: P₁
H₂: P₁
63°F
Cloudy
P₂ = 0
P₂ #0
Ho: P₁ P₂20
на: Р1-р2 < 0
1
но: P1-P2<0 0
Ha: P1 P₂ = 0
(b) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in rural Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election?
Ho: P1 P₂ ≤ 0
Ha: P₁P₂0
(c) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in urban Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election?
-
(d) At a = 0.05, test the political analysts' hypothesis.
Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
?
What is the p-value? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value =
What conclusion do you draw from your results?
Reject Ho. We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election.
We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential
Do not reiect H
2
#
3
f4
$
4
f5
40
%
5
f6
4-
4+
&
7
f8
IAA
*
fg
DII
f10
S
DDI
486
f12
insert
prt sc
20
Ə
delete
backspace
home
num
lock
end
Komo
2:21 PM
10/9/2022
pg up
00←
e
:
844
1
pg dn
pg up
Transcribed Image Text:You may need to use the appropriate appendix table or technology to answer this question. Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.t Political analysts wonder if turnout in rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 669 of 892 registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 414 out of 575 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. (a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural Minnesota were more likely than registered voters in urban Minnesota to vote in the 2016 presidential election. (Let P1 = the population proportion of voters in rural Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election and p₂ = the population proportion of voters in urban Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election.) Ho: P₁ P₂ #0 Ha: P₁ P₂ = 0 esc 1 Ho: P₁ H₂: P₁ 63°F Cloudy P₂ = 0 P₂ #0 Ho: P₁ P₂20 на: Р1-р2 < 0 1 но: P1-P2<0 0 Ha: P1 P₂ = 0 (b) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in rural Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? Ho: P1 P₂ ≤ 0 Ha: P₁P₂0 (c) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in urban Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? - (d) At a = 0.05, test the political analysts' hypothesis. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) ? What is the p-value? (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = What conclusion do you draw from your results? Reject Ho. We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential Do not reiect H 2 # 3 f4 $ 4 f5 40 % 5 f6 4- 4+ & 7 f8 IAA * fg DII f10 S DDI 486 f12 insert prt sc 20 Ə delete backspace home num lock end Komo 2:21 PM 10/9/2022 pg up 00← e : 844 1 pg dn pg up
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage