I need the answer as soon as possible Engineering and ScienceThe confusion of structural art with science assumes that engineering, being applied science, merely puts intopractice the ideas and discoveries of the scientist. The honor of creative genius and the precedence in innovation belongto the scientist; the engineer is merely the technician, following orders from above. This idea is a common twentieth-century fallacy. It was articulated, for example, by Vannevar Bush, wartime director of the Office of Scientific Researchand Development, in his influential report to President Truman which led to the establishment of the National ScienceFoundation.In a 1973 conference, leading historians of technology presented papers on the subject "The Interaction ofScience and Technology in the Industrial Age." The conference summarized the wide variety of studies by thencompleted and "overwhelmingly, the group agreed in disagreeing with the conventional view (of Bush) that technologywas applied science."There is a fundamental difference between science and technology. Engineering or technology is the making ofthings that did not previously exist, whereas science is the discovering of things that have long existed. Technologicalresults are forms that exist only because people want to make them, whereas scientific results are formulations of whatexists independently of human intentions. Technology deals with the artificial, science with the natural.Science and technology are best viewed as parallel activities, each one at times drawing on the resources of theother, but more often developing independently. An example of this independence is the fact that of the vast number oftechnological inventions made since World War II for the military, only about 0.3 percent can be traced to scientificdiscoveries; the remainder developed independently, from design stimuli within the technological community itself.In our present context, it is essential that we make the distinction between science and technology, so that wecan focus on the true sources of engineering originality..Answer ALL of the following questions1. Is machine invention considered to be science or technology? Why?2.Why we have technological results?3. Is the engineer merely a technician? Discuss4. When and where the idea of technology being applied science was changed?5.Scientific discoveries depends on human intentions. True or False

Question

I need the answer as soon as possible Engineering and ScienceThe confusion of structural art with science assumes that engineering, being applied science, merely puts intopractice the ideas and discoveries of the scientist. The honor of creative genius and the precedence in innovation belongto the scientist; the engineer is merely the technician, following orders from above. This idea is a common twentieth-century fallacy. It was articulated, for example, by Vannevar Bush, wartime director of the Office of Scientific Researchand Development, in his influential report to President Truman which led to the establishment of the National ScienceFoundation.In a 1973 conference, leading historians of technology presented papers on the subject &#34;The Interaction ofScience and Technology in the Industrial Age.&#34; The conference summarized the wide variety of studies by thencompleted and &#34;overwhelmingly, the group agreed in disagreeing with the conventional view (of Bush) that technologywas applied science.&#34;There is a fundamental difference between science and technology. Engineering or technology is the making ofthings that did not previously exist, whereas science is the discovering of things that have long existed. Technologicalresults are forms that exist only because people want to make them, whereas scientific results are formulations of whatexists independently of human intentions. Technology deals with the artificial, science with the natural.Science and technology are best viewed as parallel activities, each one at times drawing on the resources of theother, but more often developing independently. An example of this independence is the fact that of the vast number oftechnological inventions made since World War II for the military, only about 0.3 percent can be traced to scientificdiscoveries; the remainder developed independently, from design stimuli within the technological community itself.In our present context, it is essential that we make the distinction between science and technology, so that wecan focus on the true sources of engineering originality..Answer ALL of the following questions1. Is machine invention considered to be science or technology? Why?2.Why we have technological results?3. Is the engineer merely a technician? Discuss4. When and where the idea of technology being applied science was changed?5.Scientific discoveries depends on human intentions. True or False

Accepted Answer

It is defined as Engineering is making of things which did not previously exist.
Science is the…