5. Consider a decision-maker who expects to have a car accident with chance ; if this occurs, he will incur $L in damages. He can purchase as much auto insurance, q, as he likes, at a price of p per dollar of coverage: this means that if he pays pq upfront (as the insurance premium), he'll receive a payment of q from the insurance company if an accident occurs. (a) Write out his expected utility from purchasing insurance level q, assuming a utility-of- wealth function u(w) and initial wealth wo. 1 (b) Show that the optimal level of insurance, q, solves u' (wo - L+ (1 − p)q)) u' (wo - pq) P(1 - π) π(1-P) (c) Now assume that u(w) = 1- e-aw, where a > 0 (this is known as a "CARA", or "constant absolute risk aversion", utility function; a parametrizes risk aversion). Solve explicitly for the optimal insurance, and show that it does not depend on wealth.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter7: Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7.5P
icon
Related questions
Question
5. Consider a decision-maker who expects to have a car accident with chance ; if this occurs, he
will incur $L in damages. He can purchase as much auto insurance, q, as he likes, at a price
of p per dollar of coverage: this means that if he pays pq upfront (as the insurance premium),
he'll receive a payment of q from the insurance company if an accident occurs.
(a) Write out his expected utility from purchasing insurance level q, assuming a utility-of-
wealth function u(w) and initial wealth wo.
1
(b) Show that the optimal level of insurance, q, solves
u' (wo - L + (1 - p)q))
u' (wo - pq)
=
p(1 - π)
T(1-P)
(c) Now assume that u(w) 1 - e-aw, where a > 0 (this is known as a "CARA", or
"constant absolute risk aversion", utility function; a parametrizes risk aversion). Solve
explicitly for the optimal insurance, and show that it does not depend on wealth.
Transcribed Image Text:5. Consider a decision-maker who expects to have a car accident with chance ; if this occurs, he will incur $L in damages. He can purchase as much auto insurance, q, as he likes, at a price of p per dollar of coverage: this means that if he pays pq upfront (as the insurance premium), he'll receive a payment of q from the insurance company if an accident occurs. (a) Write out his expected utility from purchasing insurance level q, assuming a utility-of- wealth function u(w) and initial wealth wo. 1 (b) Show that the optimal level of insurance, q, solves u' (wo - L + (1 - p)q)) u' (wo - pq) = p(1 - π) T(1-P) (c) Now assume that u(w) 1 - e-aw, where a > 0 (this is known as a "CARA", or "constant absolute risk aversion", utility function; a parametrizes risk aversion). Solve explicitly for the optimal insurance, and show that it does not depend on wealth.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Risk Aversion
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage