25 ml of pickled brine was taken from an apple pickled with vinegar and diluted to 500 ml, 25 ml of this was taken and acidity was determined with 0.2 N (Factor: 1.05) NaOH. In the main trials, 6.3 ml - 6.5 ml - 6.9 ml, respectively, 0.1 ml base was used in the analysis without using the sample. For example, how many ppm is its acidity?

25 ml of pickled brine was taken from an apple pickled with vinegar and diluted to 500 ml, 25 ml of this was taken and acidity was determined with 0.2 N (Factor: 1.05) NaOH. In the main trials, 6.3 ml - 6.5 ml - 6.9 ml, respectively, 0.1 ml base was used in the analysis without using the sample. For example, how many ppm is its acidity?

Fundamentals Of Analytical Chemistry

9th Edition

ISBN:9781285640686

Author:Skoog

Publisher:Skoog

Chapter16: Applications Of Neutralization Titrations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.18QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sheet 5 From the following data determine the following: Define outlier and then identify the outlier in the data. Determine if the outlier should be kept of discarded from the data. Trial 1 2 3 4 HCl (mL) 22.3 28.4 29.8 29.3 NaOH (mL) 35.2 35.1 34.9 35.0
MAX OF 15 MINUTES A solution contains NaOH (FM = 40), NaHCO3 (FM = 84), and NazCO; (FM = 106), either alone or in a permissible combination. Titration of a 50 mL portion to a phenolphthalein end point requires 16.3 mL of 0.100 M HCI. A second 50.0-mL aliquot requires 38.2 mL of the HCI when titrated to a bromocresol green end point. %3D %3D What is the % w/w composition of the following? Express answers in two decimal places. If the component is not present, write 0.00 in the answer box. NAOH: NazCO3: NaHCO3: 96
The buret was filled with 0.100 M HCl solution. Then was transferred in a 25.0 mL of saturated calcium hydroxide solution (2g of calcium hydroxide per 100 ml of water) in two separate E-flasks. Then 2 drops of phenolphthalein was added to each flask Titration data for the determination of solubility and Ksp of calcium hydroxide: Trial 2: Final Buret reading (ml)-26.10; Initial Buret reading (ml)- 19.80; Temperature (Celcius)- 25 Voume of HCl used: Trial 2- 6.30mL 1. Compute for the moles of H+ used and the moles of OH- present. moles of H+ used = (concentration of HCl) × (volume of HCl used)moles of OH- = moles of H+ used 2. Construct an ICE table for the reaction.3. Calculate the molar solubility (in mol/L) of OH- and Ca2+.4. Determine the solubility of Ca(OH)2 in g/L. (MM of Ca(OH)2 = 74.096 g/mol). 5. Calculate the Ksp of Ca(OH)26. Compute for the percent error of the experimental value for Ksp of Ca(OH)2 with the literature…
10-27. A 10.231-g sample of window cleaner containing ammonia was diluted with 39.466 g of water. Then 4.373 g of solution were titrated with 14.22 mL of 0.106 3 M HCl to reach a bromocresol green end point. (a) What fraction of the 10.231-g sample of window cleaner is contained in the 4.373 g that were analyzed? (b) How many grams of NH3 (FM 17.031) were in the 4.373-g sample? (c) Find the weight percent of NH3 in the cleaner.
The buret was filled with 0.100 M HCl solution. Then was transferred in a 25.0 mL of saturated calcium hydroxide solution (2g of calcium hydroxide per 100 ml of water) in two separate E-flasks. Then 2 drops of phenolphthalein was added to each flask Titration data for the determination of solubility and Ksp of calcium hydroxide: Trial 1: Final Buret reading (ml)-19.80; Initial Buret reading (ml)- 13.00; Temperature (Celcius)- 25 Trial 2: Final Buret reading (ml)-26.10; Initial Buret reading (ml)- 19.80; Temperature (Celcius)- 25 Voume of HCl used: Trial 1- 6.80ml; Trial 2- 6.30mL 1. Compute for the moles of H+ used and the moles of OH- present. moles of H+ used = (concentration of HCl) × (volume of HCl used)moles of OH- = moles of H+ used 2. Construct an ICE table for the reaction.3. Calculate the molar solubility (in mol/L) of OH- and Ca2+.4. Determine the solubility of Ca(OH)2 in g/L. (MM of Ca(OH)2 = 74.096 g/mol). 5.…
A controversy broke out as a dead body was found in a bar on Cornelia Street. The media revealed that minutes before the person died, he described his drink as something stronger than other drinks in the bar. You were the analyst tasked to verify the cause of death. Preliminary qualitative tests showed the possible presence of cyanide in the victim's death. Thus, you tried to quantitatively detect cyanide ions in the victim's drink using spectrophotometric analysis. Standard solutions were of different CN- concentrations were made as shown in Table 2. A 25.0mL aliquot of each standard solution was added with Fe(NO3)3 to form the colored complex, [Fe(CN)6]³ (aq). Each standard solution was then diluted to a total volume of 50.0 mL. The absorbances of the diluted standard solutions were recorded using 1.00-cm cells and at Amax = 725 nm and found in Table 2. Table 2. Raw absorbance measurements for each standard solution of CN-. [CN-] prior to dilution, M Abs@725nm 0.002 0.000 0.040 0.160…
00 mL of a diprotic acid primary standard solution was accurately prepared to a concentration of 0.1431 M. Three samples of this primary standard solution were used as samples in a titration to standardize an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, NaOH, which would be used as a titrant. Using the following table of data for the titration of the primary standard acid with NaOH, calculate the average concentration of NaOH. Trial # Volume of primary standard Initial titrant volume Final titrant volume 1 10.00 mL 8.21 mL 27.22 mL 2 10.00 mL 27.22 mL 46.23 mL 3 10.00 mL 30.28 mL 49.29 mL 0.1506 M 0.0753 M 0.0376 M 0.1431 M 0.0526 M
Students measured the concentration of HCl in a solution by titrating with different indicators to find the end point. (Use the table to find critical F values.) Mean HCl concentration (M) (+ standard deviation) Indicator Number of measurements 1. Bromothymol blue 0.09565 + 0.00170 28 2. Methyl red 0.08681 ± 0.00098 18 3. Bromocresol green 0.08641 + 0.00106 29 Is the difference between Indicators 1 and 2 significant at the 95% confidence level? O Yes O No Fenlculated clegrees of freedom Ecalculated Is the difference between indicators 2 and 3 significant at the 95% confidence level? O Yes O No Fealculated Spooled tcalculated
A 0.9092g sample of wheat flour was analyzed by Kjeldahl method. The ammonia formed was distilled into 50.00 mL of 0.05063 M HCl; a 7.46 mL back titration with 0.04917 M NaOH was required. Calculate the % protein in the flour. Input the value only. Express in 2 SF.
A double indicator analysis of a soda ash sample was performed. The student weighed 0.4375 g of the soda ash sample and dissolved it to make 100.0 mL solution. The students then took a 25 mL aliquot of the sample solution, then added 25 mL H2O and performed double indicator titration. The phenolphthalein endpoint required 10.27 mL 0.04027 M HCl titrant. The sample was further titrated using Methyl Orange and took a total of 15.97 mL of the titrant to reach the endpoint. Given that the molar weight of Na2CO3 - 105.99 g/mol, NaHCO3 = 84.007 g/mol, and NaOH - 39.997 g/mol answer the following: a. What are the components of the soda ash sample? (The constituents of the sample came from Na2CO3, NaHCO3, and NaOH). b. What are the moles of each component in the titrated 25 mL aliquot? c. What is the percent composition in (% w/w) of each component in the soda ash sample?
SCE students measured the concentration of HCl in a solution by titrating with different indicators to find the end point.Indicator Mean HCl concentration (M)(± standard deviation)Number of measurementsBromothymol blue 0.09565 ± 0.00225 28Methyl red 0.08686 ± 0.00098 18Bromocresol green 0.08641 ± 0.00113 29Is the difference between indicators 1 and 2 significant at the 95% confidence level? Answer the same question for indicators 2 and 3
2+ as (6) A sample of an ore was analyzed for Cu* follows. A 1.25 g sample of the ore was dissolved in acid and diluted to volume in a 250 mL volumetric flask. A 20 mL portion of the resulting solution was transferred by pipet to a 50 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume. An analysis showed that the concentration of 2+ Cu* in the final solution was 4.62 ppm. What is the weight percent of Cu in the original ore?