1. Consider the zero-sum game given by 3 1 2 A = 4 0 2 1 2 -2 3 1 (a) Calculate the gain floor and loss ceiling for A. (b) Without using dominance, use the Equilibrium Theorem to determine whether it is possible for A to have a mixed Nash Equilibrium where player two's strategy is of the form (a, b, c, 0) with a, b, c > 0.

1. Consider the zero-sum game given by 3 1 2 A = 4 0 2 1 2 -2 3 1 (a) Calculate the gain floor and loss ceiling for A. (b) Without using dominance, use the Equilibrium Theorem to determine whether it is possible for A to have a mixed Nash Equilibrium where player two's strategy is of the form (a, b, c, 0) with a, b, c > 0.

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305585126

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
2. Consider the following game: u 1 r 6,0 0,6 d 3,2 6,0 Are there any Nash equilibria in pure strategies for this game? Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
Consider the following price game: Firm 1 Firm 2 High Low High 20, 20 12, 24 Low 24, 12 14, 14 Remark: In simultaneous move games (games with rows and columns) theconvention is to write the row player’s payoff first and the column player’spayoff second. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Recall that for each playeryou should find the best response to each of the opponents’ strategies andunderline the associated payoff. Then look for a cell where both strategiesare best responses to each other. This is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)?
5 Suppose two players play one of the two normal-form games shown in Figure 1. L U 0,-1 D 2,4 R 2,0 6,0 L U | 4,-1 D 2,-2 R 2,0Now suppose that Player 2 knows which game is being played, but Player 1 does not. Find the pure strategy Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game.
2. Consider the game matrix given here: a. If (T, L) is a dominant strategy equilibrium, then what inequalities must hold among a,…,h? b. If (T, L) is a Nash equilibrium, then which of the above inequalities must be satisfied?
The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 1 U M D L 2,10 2,5 8,7 Player 2 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 This is a simultaneous move game. In a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, Player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of If, instead of playing simultaneously, player 2 moves first, then in the Nash equilibrium player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of
Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
2. Consider the two-by-two bimatrix game listed below: Left Right (2,-2) (1,-1) Up Down (3,-3) (-1,1) where the player "Row" chooses the action "up" or "down" and the player "Column" chooses the action "left" or "right". Describe a mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium for this game.
2. Provide the normal-form expression to the extensive-form game below, and find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria there. Find the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium then. A B X E Y B A B F t G F G BF B D A 0 3. Find the subgame perfect Nash equilibria (may or may not be unique) in the game below. A B 100 30 F 60 9 5 B 3 5 12 10 60 10 80 10 180 60 200 40
Please look at the payoff matrix below which shows the benefits that would accrue to each player in a 2-player.non-sequential, non-repeated game. a) Identify the collusive (cooperative) equilibrium. b) Identify the secure strategy (maximin) equilibrium c) Identify the maximax equilibrium d) Identify the Nash equilibrium (You must clearly label each answer in eCourses to receive any credit for your answers.) Apple Inc. Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 20 40 60 60 1000 200 Strategy A 70 50 90 Banana 70 300 Inc. Strategy B 400 40 80 100 90 150 80 Strategy C
Consider the following simultaneous game: Player 1 U D Player 2 L 20,-10 -10, 20 R -10, 20 20,-10 Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Player 1 has a dominant strategy. This game has a Nash equilibrium. This game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Player 1's best response is D if player 2 plays R.
16. Consider a game with two players, each with three strategies. Given the payoff matrix shown below, determine which pair of strategies is a Nash equilibrium. Player One X Y 1 3. X' 3 1 4 Player Two Y 5 0. 3 Z' 4 (a) X, X' 21 1.