From citizens capturing incidents of police brutality on their smartphones to police departments using surveillance drones, technology is changing our relationship to the law. Preventive policing is the newest aspect of law enforcement that acts as a deterrent rather than a reaction.
I think predictive policing and using analytics to analyze crime data is going to be a part of the way that policing is done. I think it would be absurd for police departments to not use the data that they possess to reduce crime. Any paranoia of the situation turning into the Minority Report is absurd. However, I hold some reservations about the software. Moving forward, what’s relevant is the way the software is deployed. Police officers must be trained to use
…show more content…
With that said, I am not saying that predictive policing should replace other policing programs. Police still need to form relationships with communities, address problems of implicit bias, and use other methods to determine how to best deploy their resources. The use of data, like the use of any tool, leaves openings for misuse, but police departments must take steps to protect these civil liberties.
My concern comes in when police officers get into police officer mode where they sort of been enabled by a computer program to look for criminality. They’ve been told by a computer, “hey something might happen here” so when they see someone walking down the street, they’re halfway to probable cause before anything is happening.
There is certainly a racial bias component to the way predictive policing operates. You can have racism without racists. For example, maybe an algorithm will be seeing black people commit crimes disproportionately, so that gets ingrained. But race is probably not a factor causing crime; that higher crime rate could be the result of the impoverished neighborhoods, which are disproportionately populated by black people.
So, while the algorithm sorts it as “black” =>
I believe if the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment was conducted today different results would be revealed due to the fact that police strategies and tactics have changed over the years in response to changes in society, public pressures, aren research. Police executives must continually reassess their organizational technology and make adjustments to improve the attainment of the goals of protecting life and property and maintaining order. Today, the knowledge base related to what works in policing is much farther along in it development than even a decade ago, making it possible for police executives to strive toward the objective of evidence-based policing (Cordner, 2016). Moreover, evidence-based policing does not replace
From the night watch in Boston, to the present day policing, law enforcement has behind in the world of technology. As time rolled through the political era, professional era, and community-oriented era, police patrols would use the rapidly advancing technology in their favor. "Those were desperate times for policemen in a hostile country with unpaved streets and uneven sidewalks, sometimes miles from the police station, with little prospects of assistance in case of need.... It took nerve to be a policeman in those days," this was reported by Chief Francis O 'Neill of the Chicago Police Department in 1903. With only having a printing press and a multiple-shot revolver over a hundred years ago, the advancement in technology today has helped improve the policing methods in patrol quite significantly. However, technology would eventually out-run the police.
Expansion has occurred throughout the policing system through the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that a police officer cannot perform an illegal search and seizure without a warrant and probable cause (Peak, 2017, p.191). Police officers have expanded their methods such that they do not break the Constitutional rights of the people, but are able to get evidence of probable cause (Sekhon, 2017, p. 74). Police searching cars due to probable cause are an example of this exception. If someone is suspected of drunk driving, the police have a reason to check the car and the person’s sobriety (Sekhon, 2017, p. 71). With the Fourth Amendment, if a person shares information with another or someone that might be considered a third-party, the police may use this information (Crocker, 2013, p. 686). The usage of this information does not technically break the Constitutional rights of the people, therefore is an accepted method (Crocker, 2013, p. 686). Technological advances also make this amendment apply to the expansion of policing methods in more subtle ways (Crocker, 2013, p. 687). GPS tracking and surveillance are both methods used that shows the expansion of policing
The dispute of police body cameras truly hit the media hard this week. Blasting from the headlines all citizens were aware that Michael Brown was lethally shot in Ferguson, Missouri. This prompted officers to become fortified with body cameras. This technologically progressive world that we live in today has shaped a world of tweeting, posting and uploading. It’s about time that police departments take advantage of the tools accessible to them, especially with the advancement of equipment. The move forward in technology will help to alleviate speculation on any misconduct perpetrated. There now will be hard honest evidence of any crime committed against a police officer.
There are many positives that come with the technology and use of predictive policing. Police are preventing many crimes. The United
Racial profiling in law enforcement is not merely wrong, but also ineffective. Race-based assumptions in law enforcement perpetuate negative racial stereotypes that are harmful to our rich and diverse democracy, and materially impair our efforts to maintain a fair and just society. Retrieved November 15 2015 www.usdoj.gov
The issue of police body cameras really hit the media hard this week. Blasting from the headlines all citizens were aware that Michael Brown was fatally shot in Ferguson, Missouri. This prompted officers to become equipped with body cameras. This technologically advanced world that we live in today has created a world of tweeting, posting and uploading. It’s about time that police departments take advantage of the tools accessible to them especially with the advancement of equipment. The move forward in technology will help to alleviate speculation on any crime perpetrated. There now will be hard factual evidence on any crime committed against a police officer.
There is no scientific proof that links crime and race. In fact, most psychologists admit that ethnic profiling is not scientifically reliable. (Boylan) Nevertheless, no one has attempted to eradicate it until recently. This is because America’s imprisonment rates were not rising at an alarming rate until a couple of decades ago. Now that hyper incarceration is a problem experts have begun searching for its root, and ethnic profiling has surfaced as a probable cause of hyper incarceration. When you analyses the inner-workings of racial profiling you find a direct correlation between the impact of ethnic profiling and the anxiety levels of the population. In other words, as people become more scared the likelihood that they will perform or tolerate racial profiling increases.
In addition, to the assessed challenges already listed, is the concern with potential ethical issues that surround intelligence-led policing. A valid argument is that the predictive nature of intelligence-led policing mirrors an awful lot of the police profiling aspect and may lead to the violations of civil liberties. As new technology is developed and utilized it is important to discuss the ethical implications of utilizing
Since the September 11, 2001, law enforcement agencies across the nation recognized the need to integrate intelligence into their current community policing approach. When intelligence is available, decision-making is more effective and efficient. Intelligence enables law enforcement agencies to implement policies and procedures necessary to combat the concerns of the community.
Police Departments are continuing to evolve to try to stay ahead if the criminal. Police technology is most influential changes relative to modern policing. Police agencies are using modern technology such as internet to convey information to the public, smart phones with the capacity to communicate with others from the field, and mobile computers to retrieve information, (Grant & Terry, 2012). Because police officers have mobile computers while in the field,
Benjamin Todd Jealous once said, “Racial profiling punishes innocent individuals for the past actions of those who look and sound like them. It misdirects crucial resources and undercuts the trust needed between law enforcement and the communities they serve.”(Jealous, 2015). I couldn’t agree more with him. In today’s society more and more Black men and women suffer from police bias. Police is a powerful organization that was meant to serve and protect. Enforce laws and keeping communities safe. The problem is we fail to acknowledge that police are humans with real life bias. The problem with police is how much racial profiling is going up,
Worrall says, “many actual or potential offenders do not perceive police patrol as a meaningful threat.” Which it makes it hard to see if this function will have effect but it can keep some criminals
Information technology has advanced in multiple ways in society, where organizations has implement the structure into their work environment. Industries have outsource their manufacturing to other places in the world and rely on telecommunication to keep the marketing. The geographic distribution has changed significantly by reducing the distance it takes to complete an operation, due to information technology. These are just a couple of examples of how this advanced technology has reshape our society and continuing.
According to Times Magazine, “President Donald Trump signed three executive orders that will intensify the criminalization of communities of color, under the false premise the need to increase ‘law and order.’” Racism was bad before Trump, now it has worsened, is there anything else that could make things worse? In “Police Program Aims to Pinpoint Those Most Likely To Commit Crimes” by John Eligon and Timothy Williams it states that predictive policing is using math and police awareness to stop or prevent crimes from happening. “...An experiment taking place in dozens of police departments across the country, one in which authorities have turned to complex computer algorithms to try to pinpoint people most likely to be involved in future crimes” (Eligon and Williams). This means that police use predictive policing as a way to stop crimes from happening based on data. There are benefits and disadvantages that predictive policing contain. When looking at the issue of predictive policing, many might argue that predictive policing is beneficial because it can reduce crime rates and prevent deaths from happening through the use of social media. However, predictive policing has more disadvantages because of being accused guilty of whom you associate with and the use of inaccurate data leads to unfair policing.