preview

Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde

Decent Essays

1. The novel revolves around the contest between good and evil. Does evil win in the end, why or why not?
The evil side of Henry Jekyll eventually overtakes him, through spontaneously turning into Mr. Hyde even when not taking the potion. In the end, Mr. Hyde or the representation of the evil nature of man, overtakes Dr. Jekyll completely. Evil wins in the end of this novel, because as Mr. Hyde is indulged in excising his evil ways he becomes stronger and able to overtake Dr. Jekyll’s goodness. Evil can be seen winning in the end, as once one gives into evil it will take over one’s being if that careful. As Dr. Jeykll confirms this overtaking of evil within himself, by stating “my evil finally destroyed the balance of my soul” (1815). Thus, …show more content…

Hyde’s ultimate death by suicide. It can be argued that Dr. Jekyll was still able to take control of his mind and commit suicide in order that his evil nature did not live on to cause harm. As he does not want to become “that hated personality” again, therefore the only way for the goodness to win is to kill both of the natures within him (1818). So it can be seen that the last of the goodness in Dr. Jekyll/ Mr. Hyde actually overcomes the evil side by suicide.
2. Why is the novel more effective by having all the main characters — Utterson, Jekyll, Lanyon (and maybe Enfield and Sir Danvers) — be prominent, well known, respected men?
The novel is more effective by having all the main characters being prominent, well known, respected men because it helped focus more on the nature of man. In having all characters of the same gender, it allowed for more insight into the broader theme that the novel is portraying. As having a female character in the story, which could include a romance in the storyline, would distract from the nature that Stevenson is wanting to address in this novel. It can also be effective in the way that the characters are well-respected members in society, so it gives credit to the idea of man’s good versus bad nature. Therefore even prominent men struggle with the goodness and darkness that is inside every person, as Dr. Jeykll describes it as the “primitive duality of man” (1809). This …show more content…

Jekyll’s confession about everything that he did, including what happened when he was Mr. Hyde could be debated as to whether the confession was written by Jekyll or as Hyde. This is questioned as in the Dr. Jekyll is not totally in control of himself and spontaneously turns into Mr. Hyde continuously. So because of the uncertainty of the identity of Dr. Jekyll, it can be questioned which identity wrote the confession. It could have even been a bit of both that contributed to the confession letter, as it states at the end of the confession that “I bring the life of that unhappy Henry Jekyll to an end” (1818). The use of Henry Jekyll’s name in the third person can represent the idea of the contribution of Mr. Hyde to the letter. Though this can also be said for the use of Mr. Hyde’s name in the third person in the letter as well, such as “that the guilt of Hyde was patent to the world” (1815). Though it may never be known the full extent of who wrote the confessional letter, it can be determined that it is written by both natures of Dr. Jekyll’s inner

Get Access