1991
1990
1989
I. For each of the years on the Statement of Cash Flows: Major sources of cash in 1990 were investing activities, Major Sources of cash in 1989 were financing activities 1. What were the firm 's major sources of cash? Its Major sources of cash were provided by operating major uses of cash? activities. ( Cash provided by investing activities in 1991 followed by operating activities. Major uses of cash (operating activities also were sources of cash), while was much less than operating activities ). Major uses of were financing activities. major uses of cash were investing activities. cash were financing activities. 2. Was cash flow from operations greater than or CFO at $125.2M was greater than Net Income (in this
…show more content…
7. Were the working capital (current asset and current liability) accounts other than cash ad cash equivalents primarily sources of cash, or users of cash? 8. What other major items affected cash flows?
Current assets $258M were primarily sources of cash. Current assets $174.3M were primarily sources of cash. Current assets ($61.2M) were primarily uses of cash. Current liabilities ($91.3M) were primarily uses of cash. Current liabilities ($22.5M) were primarily uses of cash. Current liabilities $41M were primarily sources of cash. Overall working capital accounts were sources of cash in Overall working capital accounts were sources of cash in Overall working capital accounts were uses of cash in 1991 at $169.5M. 1990 at $165.9M. 1989 at ($30.7M). Other items affecting cash and not discussed in questions above were proceeds from sale of Class B common stock $5M and purchase of treasury stock ($0.3M) in financing activities. Other items affecting cash and not discussed in questions above were proceeds from sale of Class B common stock $8.7M and purchase of treasury stock ($0.6M) in financing activities. Other items affecting cash and not discussed in questions above were proceeds from sale of Class B common stock $17.5M and purchase of treasury stock ($18.8M) in financing activities.
1991 II. What was the trend in:
1990
1989
9. Net
Based on the income statement and balance sheet, we can get the cash flow statement for year 2002, 2003 and the first quarter of 2004. From the cash flow, it is obviously see that the main use of fund is for operations, materials purchasing, wages payment, interest payment etc. While the source of fund is from financing, bank loan and trade notes payables.
4. Did the cash flow from operations cover both the capital expenditures and the firm’s dividend payments, if any?
ACC/291 March 25,2012 Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times
Operating cash flow was not enough to cover capital investments (this firm does not to appear to pay dividends as it does not show in the prior 3 years). The firm is financing it operations from the issuance of common stock. $23,082 was raised during the period, which is covering its investments in capital expenditures.
The statement of cash flows answers the following questions about cash: (a) Where did the cash come from during the period? (b) What
The cash flow statement shows the amount of cash within a company. Items that affect the cash balance are listed on the statement. The first section of the cash flow statement is operating activities, which shows the cash flowing in and out of the company in relation to its business operation. The operating activities section also includes net income and the change in dollars of certain accounts listed on the balance sheet. The next section, investing activities, shows cash the company received and spent on a company's capital investments. The financing activities section shows the inflows and outflows of cash related to the company’s issued financial securities, which is also listed on the balance sheet and statement of shareholders' equity.
Increase in current liabilities Substantial increase in current liabilities weakened the company’s liquidity position. Its current liabilities were US$2,063.94 million at the end of FY2010, a 48.09% increase compared to the previous year. However, its current assets recorded a marginal increase of 25.07% - from US$1,770.02 million at the end of FY2009 to US$2,213.72 million at the end of FY2010. Following this, the company’s current ratio declined from 1.27 at the end of the FY2009 to 1.07 at the end of FY2010. A lower current ratio indicates that the company is in a weak financial position, and it may find it difficult to meet its day-to-day obligations.
The cash flow statement consists of three parts: cash flows provided by operating activities of $13,831, cash flows provided by investing activities, and cash flows provided by financing activities effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents of ($204)
2. The single most important assessment in Cash Flows in the “cash flow from financial operations” because it provides an overlook on management’s operating decisions. In this case, we can see that Reebok had reported positive cash flows from operations, for example in 1990 reported $39.2M while LA Gear reported a negative (40M) the same year. Looking closely, we can see that LA Gear was retaining huge quantities of inventory while at the same time, not collecting enough money from customers (A/R). Hence we can conclude that for Reebok, operations was a source of cash but on the other hand, LA Gear was quite the opposite: operations was a use (or drain) of cash. Turning our attention to “cash flows from financing activities” we can see that more differences. Reebok is borrowing little money, instead it is paying loans. LA Gear is borrowing huge quantities of money, for example in 1990 it borrowed $56M. As a result of this, we can see where the money to finance
If A/P increases from one year to the next, that means that the difference between the two amounts is cash that was available for current use. That is, instead of paying cash, whatever was purchased was put on an account. On the other hand, A/R is considered a use of cash because for every dollar that should be coming in to the company from those who owe the company money, that cash has been delayed for a collection time period. Therefore, the company does not have the money to use for its own operations.
Exhibit 6, 8, and 9 (figures in $ millions) provides selected balance sheet items for Ford, General Motors, and DaimlerChrylser. The given information indicates that Ford carries the highest amount of cash and marketable securities among the three companies. In 1999, Ford had $25,173 of cash and marketable securities while General Motors and Daimler-Chrylser have only $12,140 and $9,163. Comparing at an industry level, we as a team
2. Magnetronics had $7,380 invested in accounts receivables at year-end 1999. Its average sales per day were $133,614 during 1999 and its average collection period was 55.23 days. This represented an improvement from the average collection period of 58.68 days in 1995.
Balance Sheet: Assets, such as Cash and Cash equivalents are up over last year by $20.72 million dollars, whereas Short Term Investments where 0 at the end of 2013 they were slightly up to $1.12 by January 3, 2015. Other Assets shows a drop of $8.26 million dollars, mostly in Property, Plant and Equipment. Based on the 10-K report the balance sheet was in the thousands other web based financial reporting sites show the numbers to be in the millions. Upon further review of the Balance Sheet from the financial website “Watch” the break down in Property, Plant and Equipment shows the biggest difference in the Accumulated Depreciation. (Market Watch) The Vertical Ratio for 2014 Total Current Assets is 3% of the Total Assets and in 2013 was also 3%. The Horizontal Ratio for Total Asset were 37% reflecting a change from 2014 at $212.05 and 2013 $195.61 signaling a significant increase in 2014. The 2015 financial were not completed at the time of this report but the
1994 Liabilities and Equity Short-term borrowings Accounts payable Progress collections and price adjustments accrued Dividends payable Taxes accrued Other costs and expenses accrued Current liabilities Long-term borrowings Other liabilities Total liabilities Minority interest in equity of consolidated affiliates Preferred stock Common stock Amounts received for stock in excess of par value Retained earnings Deduct common stock held in treasury Total shareowners’ equity Total liabilities and equity $644.9 696.0 1,000.5 72.8 337.2 1,128.1 $3,879.5 1,195.2 518.9 5,593.6 $ 71.2 $ — $465.2 414.5 3,000.5 $3,880.2 (175.9 ) $3,704.3 $9,369.1 $665.2 673.5 718.4 72.7 310.0 1,052.6 $3,492.4 917.2 492.1 4,901.7 50.1 — $463.8 409.5 2,683.6 $3,556.9 (184.5 ) $3,372.4 $8,324.2 $ $120.6 376.2 300.5 58.7 318.3 392.6 $1,566.9 364.1 221.0 2,152.0 41.4 — $455.8 266.9 1,384.5 $2,107.2 — $2,107.0 $4,300.6 1993 1985